|
Hi @imagejan , Could this provide a mechanism to solve imagej/imagej-legacy#243 as well ? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@NicoKiaru absolutely, it could solve the problem of having Pet@57a3e26a instead of Felix as a name in your example. In general, this allows giving names to any object of a third-party library (i.e. not under your control) by adding a NameProvider plugin that can be discovered at runtime. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Then it could be adde in the ij1 macro engine I guess ? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@NicoKiaru iff the change proposed here gets merged and included in a release, and then the change from v.toString() to objectService.getName(v) you proposed in https://github.com/imagej/imagej-legacy/pull/243/files#diff-de04251535e202b6132a0485276551de8ec4b1e86a639a9b54c67d63527ef5e1R251 is indeed sufficient to have the desired recording behavior (for objects where you also implement a NameProvider). The remaining issue would then be the other direction, determining the object from the given name, which is potentially ambiguous, but let's discuss this on the imagej-legacy issue. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
The remaining issue would then be the other direction, determining the object from the given name, which is potentially ambiguous Getting a converter from String to an object can be handled quite correctly by converter I find, but ok, let's keep this as a discussion in imagej-legacy. For this PR, I have a question regarding the following use case: Imagine you have 5 different objects in the object service of a certain class Image. Would the mechanism you suggest assign a name to an array of such objects ? This could be convenient for an Image[] input parameter for instance. If yes, could we make this modular ? Like can Object in your example, be of class Image[] ? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This allows to define a way to derive names from objects of third party libraries, e.g. for use in ObjectService, where objects are registered with a name and can be provided e.g. in a drop-down choice in the UI.
This pull request, together with imagej/imagej-legacy#263, will resolve this forum discussion about being able to automatically populate ij.measure.ResultsTable inputs, provided we implement the following ResultsTableNameProvider in a follow-up pull request to imagej-legacy:
(Suggestions welcome to make this even more concise!)