← 返回首页
PEP 817: Final set of pre-split updates by mgorny · Pull Request #4867 · python/peps · GitHub
Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Toggle navigation
Sign in
Appearance settings
Search or jump to...

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted
Cancel Submit feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Cancel Create saved search
Appearance settings
Resetting focus

PEP 817: Final set of pre-split updates#4867

Open
mgorny wants to merge 7 commits into
python:mainfrom
wheelnext:pep-817-update
Open

PEP 817: Final set of pre-split updates#4867
mgorny wants to merge 7 commits into
python:mainfrom
wheelnext:pep-817-update

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mgorny commented Mar 19, 2026 •
edited by hugovk
Loading

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

This is a set of updates to PEP 817 that were prepared prior to the decision to split it into smaller PEPs. We do not intend to pursue PEP 817 in this updated form. However, we would like to get the changes committed to the repository so that the history of changes is not lost.

The changes include refocusing of the security details, some clarifications, tool behavior outlines and update for the images to respect dark theme.

We are not marking the PEP as withdrawn, as our current plan is to eventually replace the specification part with an index listing the split PEPs.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4867.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0817/

PEP 817: Final set of pre-split updates …
e998ca1
This is a set of updates to PEP 817 that were prepared prior to the decision to split it into smaller PEPs. We do not intend to pursue PEP 817 in this updated form. However, we would like to get the changes committed to the repository so that the history of changes is not lost. The changes include refocusing of the security details, some clarifications, tool behavior outlines and update for the images to respect dark theme. We are not marking the PEP as withdrawn, as our current plan is to eventually replace the specification part with an index listing the split PEPs. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
mgorny requested review from dstufft and warsaw as code owners March 19, 2026 16:58
rgommers approved these changes May 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rgommers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

This was reviewed in detail by multiple co-authors before opening this PR. It contains important clarifications, as well as the diagram that multiple reviewers found really helpful.

PEP editors, can this please be merged?

hugovk reviewed May 19, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread peps/pep-0817/avx512_gromacs_benchmark.svg Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817/conceptual_diagram_installers.svg Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mgorny added 5 commits May 22, 2026 15:30
Unblockquote the diagram …
295e3d7
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
Add alt-text for the diagram …
47fc562
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
Replace the diagram with a PNG …
ef387bb
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
Invert the pytorch selector image too …
7cd352e
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
Merge branch 'main' into pep-817-update
8fe969a
Copy link
Copy Markdown

read-the-docs-community Bot commented May 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Documentation build overview

📚 pep-previews | 🛠️ Build #32823496 | 📁 Comparing 0e3f827 against latest (0d6797e)

  🔍 Preview build  

699 files changed · ± 699 modified

± Modified

willingc approved these changes May 22, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

willingc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

Thanks. Let's try to land this since it adds useful diagrams which readers will benefit from viewing

Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment thread peps/pep-0817.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Apply suggestions from code review …
0e3f827
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

willingc commented May 23, 2026

@rgommers I think if @warsaw or @dstufft approve, then we can go ahead and merge. I'm fine with merging as is.

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

willingc willingc approved these changes

hugovk hugovk approved these changes

warsaw Awaiting requested review from warsaw warsaw is a code owner

dstufft Awaiting requested review from dstufft dstufft is a code owner

+1 more reviewer

rgommers rgommers approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Footer

© 2026 GitHub, Inc.