← 返回首页
[3.11] gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs (GH-92792) by miss-islington · Pull Request #93967 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Toggle navigation
Sign in
Appearance settings
Search or jump to...

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings
Resetting focus

[3.11] gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs (GH-92792)#93967

Merged
brettcannon merged 1 commit into
python:3.11from
miss-islington:backport-71354ad-3.11
Jun 21, 2022
Merged

[3.11] gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs (GH-92792)#93967
brettcannon merged 1 commit into
python:3.11from
miss-islington:backport-71354ad-3.11

Conversation

miss-islington commented Jun 17, 2022
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Per @brettcannon 's suggestions on the Discourse thread, discussed in GH-92611 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the cgi module deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594).

@brettcannon , should this be backported (without the deprecated-removed , which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+?
(cherry picked from commit 71354ad)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

…thonGH-92792) Per @brettcannon 's [suggestions on the Discourse thread](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-594-take-2-removing-dead-batteries-from-the-standard-library/13508/51), discussed in pythonGH-92611 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the `cgi` module deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594). @brettcannon , should this be backported (without the `deprecated-removed` , which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+? (cherry picked from commit 71354ad) Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

brettcannon merged commit 41964de into python:3.11 Jun 21, 2022
miss-islington deleted the backport-71354ad-3.11 branch June 21, 2022 21:51
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Footer

© 2026 GitHub, Inc.