← 返回首页
[3.11] gh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated modules (GH-92793) by miss-islington · Pull Request #93026 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Toggle navigation
Sign in
Appearance settings
Search or jump to...

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted
Cancel Submit feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Cancel Create saved search
Appearance settings
Resetting focus

[3.11] gh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated modules (GH-92793)#93026

Merged
brettcannon merged 1 commit into
python:3.11from
miss-islington:backport-31fa41e-3.11
May 20, 2022
Merged

[3.11] gh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated modules (GH-92793)#93026
brettcannon merged 1 commit into
python:3.11from
miss-islington:backport-31fa41e-3.11

Conversation

miss-islington commented May 20, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As discussed in GH-92611 and GH-92564 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper deprecated-removed role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to GH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using deprecated-removed on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

pythongh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated… …
5c91c57
… modules (pythonGH-92793) As discussed in pythonGH-92611 and pythonGH-92564 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper `deprecated-removed` role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts. Related to pythonGH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using `deprecated-removed` on those functions can be moved to this one. (cherry picked from commit 31fa41e) Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
miss-islington requested review from a team and ethanfurman as code owners May 20, 2022 21:48
bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request May 20, 2022
Merged

miss-islington commented May 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment

miss-islington commented May 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

bedevere-bot added skip news docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 20, 2022

miss-islington commented May 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

brettcannon merged commit 24223ec into python:3.11 May 20, 2022
miss-islington deleted the backport-31fa41e-3.11 branch May 20, 2022 22:33
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

brettcannon brettcannon approved these changes
ethanfurman Awaiting requested review from ethanfurman ethanfurman is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Footer

© 2026 GitHub, Inc.