|
I've messed up the issue number, sorry! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Looks like this hack was added in ~2006. Some research of existing code to see if anything still relies on it is warranted before merging, it seems very unlikely. if so we'd want a deprecation period. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Quoting the original issue: I've never seen this before, so I went and searched for this on the internet: https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_ I've done a minimal research. I was not able to find any references to it. I don't feel qualified in this specific module and its history to make an educated decision here. However, deprecation period is always a good idea 👍 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but please complete the doc.
This attribute was untested and undocumented. I never heard about it.
Looks like not a single GitHub project uses it.
I ran a code search in PyPI top 5000 projects: no projects use it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! FWIW I also searched our huge internal codebase at Google, nothing found that uses this odd thing.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.