← 返回首页
Improve binary extension docs by thewtex · Pull Request #531 · pypa/packaging.python.org · GitHub
Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Toggle navigation
Sign in
Appearance settings
Search or jump to...

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings
Resetting focus

Improve binary extension docs#531

Merged
theacodes merged 3 commits into
pypa:masterfrom
thewtex:improve-binary-extension-docs
Jul 3, 2018
Merged

Improve binary extension docs#531
theacodes merged 3 commits into
pypa:masterfrom
thewtex:improve-binary-extension-docs

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thewtex commented Jul 3, 2018

No description provided.

theacodes merged commit 5439033 into pypa:master Jul 3, 2018
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks, @thewtex!

thewtex deleted the improve-binary-extension-docs branch July 3, 2018 16:46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

thewtex commented Jul 3, 2018

Thanks for the lightning quick review and integration @theacodes ! ⚡

Copy link
Copy Markdown

dhermes commented Jul 21, 2018

https://packaging.python.org/guides/packaging-binary-extensions/ still says "Last Reviewed: 2013-12-08". Need to update?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dhermes probably. We've been removing those things from pages, so it'd be nice if someone sent a PR to do that to this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

dhermes commented Jul 24, 2018
edited
Loading

I feel the nudge to send the PR 😀 but I like those :Page Status:, :Last Reviewed: extras so it'd be sad if I gave them the ax. (Though I understand why they'd get stale.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Something along the lines of the discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sphinx-dev/6G8TWtIVN14 to show when a particular page was last touched might be interesting.

Either way, we rarely remember to update the "last reviewed" markers, so I don't think they're accurate enough to be useful - they're currently more likely to give the impression that info is more outdated than it actually is.

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Footer

© 2026 GitHub, Inc.