Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Linked to Plane Work Item(s) This comment was auto-generated by Plane |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Saurabhkmr98 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 25 minutes and 41 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 8c1a7e5f-6f9f-46d4-855f-312193f834e4 📥 CommitsReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5bf22d5 and 0cd90d6. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis PR extends the Plane Node SDK with comprehensive epic management capabilities, adding CRUD operations (create, update, delete) and issue-management methods (listIssues, addIssues) to the Epics API resource. Corresponding TypeScript models and expanded test coverage were introduced. Package version bumped to 0.2.10. Changes
Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram
participant Client as SDK Client
participant EpicAPI as Epics API
participant Backend as Backend Service
rect rgba(76, 175, 80, 0.5)
Note over Client,Backend: Epic Lifecycle Operations
Client->>EpicAPI: create(workspaceSlug, projectId, data)
EpicAPI->>Backend: POST /epics
Backend-->>EpicAPI: Epic
EpicAPI-->>Client: Epic
Client->>EpicAPI: listIssues(workspaceSlug, projectId, epicId)
EpicAPI->>Backend: GET /epics/{epicId}/issues
Backend-->>EpicAPI: PaginatedResponse<EpicIssue>
EpicAPI-->>Client: PaginatedResponse<EpicIssue>
Client->>EpicAPI: addIssues(workspaceSlug, projectId, epicId, data)
EpicAPI->>Backend: POST /epics/{epicId}/issues
Backend-->>EpicAPI: EpicIssue[]
EpicAPI-->>Client: EpicIssue[]
Client->>EpicAPI: update(workspaceSlug, projectId, epicId, data)
EpicAPI->>Backend: PATCH /epics/{epicId}
Backend-->>EpicAPI: Epic
EpicAPI-->>Client: Epic
Client->>EpicAPI: delete(workspaceSlug, projectId, epicId)
EpicAPI->>Backend: DELETE /epics/{epicId}
Backend-->>EpicAPI: void
EpicAPI-->>Client: void
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem🐰 Hop through epics with grace and care,
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches 🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. ❤️ ShareComment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
57-57: Avoid using any type for the params parameter.
Per coding guidelines, avoid any types. Consider defining a proper interface for pagination/filter parameters.
♻️ Example typed paramsThen use:
As per coding guidelines: "Avoid any types; use proper typing or unknown with type guards"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents53-63: Method names use "Issues" instead of "WorkItems", violating naming guideline.
The coding guidelines specify: "Never use 'Issue' in names — always use 'Work Item'". Consider renaming:
As per coding guidelines: "Never use 'Issue' in names — always use 'Work Item'"
Also applies to: 68-78
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents39-41: Consider renaming delete to del to match the standard pattern.
Per coding guidelines, standard resource methods should follow the pattern: list, create, retrieve, update, del. This method is named delete instead of del.
♻️ Suggested renameAs per coding guidelines: "Standard resource methods should follow the pattern: list, create, retrieve, update, del"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents51-64: Derive UpdateEpic from CreateEpic using Partial.
Per coding guidelines, DTOs should be derived using Pick, Omit, and Partial. Since UpdateEpic has the exact same fields as CreateEpic but all optional, it can be derived:
♻️ Suggested derivationAs per coding guidelines: "Models should use TypeScript interfaces with separate Create/Update DTOs derived using Pick, Omit, and Partial"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents70-102: Rename EpicIssue to EpicWorkItem to comply with naming guideline.
The coding guidelines specify: "Never use 'Issue' in names — always use 'Work Item'".
♻️ Suggested renameAlso update the API methods in src/api/Epics.ts to use EpicWorkItem instead of EpicIssue.
As per coding guidelines: "Never use 'Issue' in names — always use 'Work Item'"
🤖 Prompt for AI AgentsConfiguration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 392da9eb-667f-4692-b2e4-a96470881719
📥 CommitsReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3c564e and 5bf22d5.
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Description
Type of Change
Test Scenarios