← 返回首页
Remove `@NoEffect` annotations by EliahKagan · Pull Request #1677 · gitpython-developers/GitPython · GitHub
Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Toggle navigation
Sign in
Appearance settings
Search or jump to...

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted
Cancel Submit feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Cancel Create saved search
Appearance settings
Resetting focus

Remove @NoEffect annotations #1677

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Byron merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2023
Conversation 7 Commits 1 Checks 0 Files changed
Merged

Remove @NoEffect annotations #1677

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension .py  (3) All 1 file type selected Viewed files
Conversations
Failed to load comments. Retry
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files. Retry
Loading
Diff view
Unified
Split
Hide whitespace
Apply and reload
Show whitespace
Diff view
Unified
Split
Hide whitespace
Apply and reload
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions test/test_docs.py
Show comments
View file Edit file Delete file
Open in desktop
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ def update(self, op_code, cur_count, max_count=None, message=""):
open(new_file_path, "wb").close() # create new file in working tree
cloned_repo.index.add([new_file_path]) # add it to the index
# Commit the changes to deviate masters history
cloned_repo.index.commit("Added a new file in the past - for later merege")
cloned_repo.index.commit("Added a new file in the past - for later merge")

# prepare a merge
master = cloned_repo.heads.master # right-hand side is ahead of us, in the future
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ def update(self, op_code, cur_count, max_count=None, message=""):

# .gitmodules was written and added to the index, which is now being committed
cloned_repo.index.commit("Added submodule")
assert sm.exists() and sm.module_exists() # this submodule is defintely available
assert sm.exists() and sm.module_exists() # this submodule is definitely available
sm.remove(module=True, configuration=False) # remove the working tree
assert sm.exists() and not sm.module_exists() # the submodule itself is still available

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -263,9 +263,9 @@ def test_references_and_objects(self, rw_dir):
# [8-test_references_and_objects]
hc = repo.head.commit
hct = hc.tree
hc != hct # noqa: B015 # @NoEffect
hc != repo.tags[0] # noqa: B015 # @NoEffect
hc == repo.head.reference.commit # noqa: B015 # @NoEffect
assert hc != hct
assert hc != repo.tags[0]
assert hc == repo.head.reference.commit
# ![8-test_references_and_objects]

# [9-test_references_and_objects]
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions test/test_refs.py
Show comments
View file Edit file Delete file
Open in desktop
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ def test_head_reset(self, rw_repo):
head_tree = head.commit.tree
self.assertRaises(ValueError, setattr, head, "commit", head_tree)
assert head.commit == old_commit # and the ref did not change
# we allow heds to point to any object
# we allow heads to point to any object
head.object = head_tree
assert head.object == head_tree
# cannot query tree as commit
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ def test_head_reset(self, rw_repo):
cur_head.reference.commit,
)
# it works if the new ref points to the same reference
assert SymbolicReference.create(rw_repo, symref.path, symref.reference).path == symref.path # @NoEffect
assert SymbolicReference.create(rw_repo, symref.path, symref.reference).path == symref.path
SymbolicReference.delete(rw_repo, symref)
# would raise if the symref wouldn't have been deletedpbl
symref = SymbolicReference.create(rw_repo, symref_path, cur_head.reference)
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion test/test_submodule.py
Show comments
View file Edit file Delete file
Open in desktop
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show hidden characters
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ def _do_base_tests(self, rwrepo):

# force it to reread its information
del smold._url
smold.url == sm.url # noqa: B015 # @NoEffect
smold.url == sm.url # noqa: B015 # FIXME: Should this be an assertion?
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Byron Sep 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

If made into an assertion it would fail, I wonder if this means that there is a bug in the submodule implementation or the assertion is simply wrong to begin with. Maybe it's an assertion that doesn't work similarly on all platforms?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

EliahKagan Sep 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

I'm not fully clear on what is expected to happen. In context, we have:

GitPython/test/test_submodule.py

Lines 107 to 114 in b27a89f

# some commits earlier we still have a submodule, but its at a different commit
smold = next(Submodule.iter_items(rwrepo, self.k_subm_changed))
assert smold.binsha != sm.binsha
assert smold != sm # the name changed
# force it to reread its information
del smold._url
smold.url == sm.url # noqa: B015 # FIXME: Should this be an assertion?

When it is made into an assertion, pytest shows:

E AssertionError: assert 'git://gitorious.org/git-python/gitdb.git' == 'https://github.com/gitpython-developers/gitdb.git' E - https://github.com/gitpython-developers/gitdb.git E + git://gitorious.org/git-python/gitdb.git test/test_submodule.py:114: AssertionError

Is the different remote URL part of what this intends to test? Or is this something that broke at some point (or would have broken, if it were an assertion) as a result of moving the remote to GitHub?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Byron Sep 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

It's surprising to see a gitorious URL there - where would that be coming from?

When looking at this confused, I'd think it's definitely not suitable as tutorial of any kind. Maybe it's better to either revamp it into something more useful, or remove it entirely.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

EliahKagan Sep 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

I don't think this was part of the tutorial. In this PR, I removed @NoEffect everywhere in the tests, not just in lines of code that are included in the generated documentation. (This occurrence was in the submodule tests.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Byron Sep 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

Oh, thanks for the clarification, I should have known by looking at the filename in the provided code excerpt.

Since it's already a FIXME, I presume that when trying to improve the GitPython package layout and maybe make submodule tests independent of their containing repository, this will naturally be resolved.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

EliahKagan Sep 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality Hide comment

I think making the tests independent would entail fixing it. Whether or not improving the package layout would depends in more details of how that is done. It could also probably be fixed directly, but this would require figuring out where that old URL came from and what, exactly, the bounds are of what the test intends (or should intend) to test.

# test config_reader/writer methods
sm.config_reader()
Expand Down
Toggle all file notes Toggle all file annotations

Footer

© 2026 GitHub, Inc.