Support newer UAA response fields and grant types by jorbaum · Pull Request #1340 · cloudfoundry/cf-java-client · GitHub
Conversation
Some UAA seem to send a slightly different reply. This accepts and tests
for both.
Tests login endpoint instead, which should usually be present
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Footer
You can’t perform that action at this time.
Different (likely newer?) versions of the open-source UAA (tested against v78.6.0) return fields and values that the client doesn't model, causing deserialization failures.
This PR adds support for:
Integration test changes:
AI tools used: Claude Code and GitHub Copilot (Opus 4.6) assisted me during development. I reviewed the result.